If it had been a republican in office the news media would have gone wild especially after the obvious attempted to cover up the gross incompetence of not making sure the consulate had the protection it requested. An yes it will embolden future attacks. Shame on you for your obvious bias !

Hey Jamie Robe,

What about OBAMA???? He was lying all night? Have you done your FACT CHECK?
If not, read the following >>>>>

OBAMA: "What I've also said is, for (those earning) above $250,000, we can go back to the tax rates we had when Bill Clinton was president."

THE FACTS: Not exactly. The Bush tax cuts set the top income rate at 35 percent. Under Obama's proposal to raise taxes on households earning more than $250,000, the president would return the top rate to the 39.6 percent set during the Clinton administration. But he neglected to mention that his health care law includes a new 0.9 percent Medicare surcharge on households earning over that amount – and that tax would be retained. The health care law also imposes a 3.8 percent tax on investment income for high earners. So tax rates would be higher for the wealthiest Americans than they were under Clinton.

Robe...Romney was only trying to get the truth for the American people. Obama and his administration has lied about the terrorist attack from the very beginning. It made me fill disgusted when Obama was defending his administration and said he was offended. Hey! There was four American lives lost because his Secretary of Defense did not provide security when Ambassador Stephens asked for it. They never even repaired a opening in the wall of the embassy by a past attach. No Robe...the Republican Party is seeking the truth about this tragic cover-up and tragic it is for America. Obama is trying to lie his way past the election...we Americans realize this. We expected Romney to talk about it. Candy Crowly of CNN did a terrible dishonor to herself when she took up for Obama about the Rose
Garden meeting. This was against everything a commentator should not do. Then
later had to apologize that Romney was right. Then after Obama claimed it was not
a terrorist attack, but the u-tube moviie. Come on!!. It doesn't empower the enemies of freedom, nor emboldened potential future attackers. Obama has already did a sorry job of this....apologizing to our enemies...instead of standing up to them. Weak, Weak he is to the whole world. Disgusting !!! Shame on you Obama.

you know, people died here... this was a known hotspot. it wasn't a secret. there were direct attacks on the compound many times over the last few months.. as well as an attack on an amassador outside of the compound. CLEARLY there needed to be heavier security on this embassy. they were caught with their pants down no matter what the media says about movies on youtube... that was an outright lie. THAT OFFENDS ME. PLUS you don't see any news about the other embassy worker who was investigating this situation murdered outside of the compound in yemen... why is that????

It apparently comes as a surprise to most Pro-Romney commenters that this is a very dangerous and complicated world. The State Department people who work in foreign countries risk their lives every day. And every administration, Republican and Democratic has had consulates and embassies -- and under President Reagan, a Marine base where 279 marines died-- attacked. The standard protocol for protection of embassies and consulates is to depend on the police of the host country for protection. In a new democracy such as Libya this presents a real problem. Ambassador Stevens was a brave man who apparently knew the country well and knowingly went where there were risks to do his job. It is so offensive to use his death and the deaths of the other three Americans with him to score political points. BTW, Katina Y, it is the State Department not the Defense Department which is responsible for refusing to renew a special security force for the consulate in Benghazi. There are other errors in your comment, too. And T. Weston, stop the "victim" mentality about how the media would have "gone wild" if this had happened under a Republican Administration. Is that what happened on 9/11/01? No, Americans united and supported the current President. Shame on you and Gov. Romney for not doing that in this case.

You want to say shame on Romney for bringing up the brutalization and death of an American ambassador, plus three others, and you don't want to hold the President accountable for not being straight forward with the American public? How about the democratic attacks on Romney for his work with Bain Capital. He used investor money to save companies while the President used taxpayer money to prop up failing companies owned by donors to his campaign. Put shame where it belongs.

I am not seeing one thought or mention of how the GOP led House voted to cut embassy security by $330M. By all means, criticise Obama for not having exactly all of the facts immediately following the attack but not a peep when Bush and Co were following bad intelligence that took us down a garden path into war.

Bottom line is we still don't know how Romney is going to finance all of his fancy cuts- first he wanted everyone to have $17k in deductions then upped it to $25k. In the corporate world you have a few guys at the top making big bucks and the rest of the workers doing the jobs of 2 or 3 people with stagnant wages and trimmed benefits.Clearly thats what plenty of people want here, but just remember it's only the few at top that do well. I hope your straw gets picked!

Another Obamazombie. It was a draw. Obama trying to make up for lost ground and Candy losing control early.

and let's not forget, Mitt as rude and disruptive as ever

Hey Eileen Lanigan. Have you done any FACT CHECK? Well read the following >>>>>OBAMA: "Let's take the money that we've been spending on war over the last decade to rebuild America, roads, bridges, schools. We do those things, not only is your future going to be bright, but America's future is going to be bright as well."

THE FACTS: What Obama didn't mention is that much of the money that has been paying for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan was borrowed. In fact, the government borrows nearly 40 cents for every dollar it spends. Thus using money that had been earmarked for wars to build schools and infrastructure would involve even more borrowing, adding to the federal deficit.

OBAMA: "And what I want to do is build on the 5 million jobs that we've created over the last 30 months in the private sector alone."

THE FACTS: As he has done before, Obama is cherry-picking his numbers to make them sound better than they really are. He ignores the fact that public-sector job losses have dragged down overall job creation. Also, he chooses just to mention the past 30 months. That ignores job losses during his presidency up until that point. According to the Labor Department, about 4.5 million total jobs have been created over the past 30 months. But some 4.3 million jobs were lost during the earlier months of his administration. At this point, Obama is a net job creator, but only marginally.

Would not vote for Obama if he was the last person on this earth!!!!

In other words "please vote for the man who killed two American citizens with a drone." Oh, wait, Romney agreed with that decision. And oh yeah, I forgot, it doesn't matter because the American citizens are not worried about being put on his hit list. Corruption all around. We need real change.

Looks like the Kool-Aid drinkers are out in full force. You freaking zombies.

I totally agree with your well-stated sentiments.

30 months takes us back to some time in '09. When he got in we were losing millions of jobs. People expected what? A snap of the fingers and instant repair of the last tears of disaster? During previous recessions the gov't did a great deal of hiring (under gop presidents) and these were partly what triggered the recoveries. This time gov't cut jobs. When we look at the EU we see example after example of austerity. Right now there are riots happening all over Europe. people are hungry and are tired of all of the cuts. This has undermined their economy and prolonged their recession. Meanwhile, stimulus was done here. While recover has not been speedy it has been happening- we are no longer losing jobs at the rate we were 36 mos ago. The funny thing is the EU is absolutely reviled by the GOP. They carry on about how awful it is yet they want to do exactly the same thing the EU is doing- cut, cut, cut. Look who suffers under cuts and who gains.

He didnt have to answer to Romney for he was not the moderator. DUHHHHHHHHH

He would not answer the question you idiot, because he didn't want to admit that he was wrong. Regardless of him being the moderator or not, Obama could have just answered it fine to set him straight, but he would have lied. So he dodged it instead Carol.

Lies! You want lies?
We can cut everybody's taxes and balance the budget: LIE
I want to help the middle class: LIE
I want to preserve Medicare: LIE
Obama's stimulus plan did nothing: LIE
Obama's foreign policy is weak: LIE
Obama will raise taxes on small businesses: LIE
47% pay no taxes: LIE
Romney will grow Pell grants: LIE
And, for Chrissake, we didn't blame GW for weak defense when the ORIGINAL 9/11 happened. We can't blame Obama for 9/11/2012 in a faraway land: LIE
Grow up, wake up and smell the coffee.
Re-elect the President, add a few Dems to the House, and watch this country spring forward: TRUTH

No, he can't -- not with near-treasonous opposition from Mitch McConnell and his ilk who are more interested in seeing Obama fail than seeing America succeed.
People with flags on their Japanese pickups and German Beemers think Obama is the problem.
Ridiculous faith in trickle-down economics is the problem. Grover f-ing Norquist is the problem.
Obama plus a few more Dems in the House is the solution.

Such detail checking. . . Did you want to score debate points using the death of 4 Americans? Or do you want to know what was actually said by President Obama? Check the Rose Garden speech transcript: "Acts of terrorism" said by the President. Too bad for you Romney voters that it is such a complicated world; we all know you find facts too hard to comprehend and prefer a fantasy world of your own construction. And of course, someone who chose to support the Vietnam war but spend his time in France rather than fighting is so much more fit to be Commander in Chief!!!

The United States condemns in the strongest terms this outrageous and shocking attack. We're working with the government of Libya to secure our diplomats. I've also directed my administration to increase our security at diplomatic posts around the world. And make no mistake, we will work with the Libyan government to bring to justice the killers who attacked our people.

Since our founding, the United States has been a nation that respects all faiths. We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. But there is absolutely no justification to this type of senseless violence. None. The world must stand together to unequivocally reject these brutal acts.

Already, many Libyans have joined us in doing so, and this attack will not break the bonds between the United States and Libya. Libyan security personnel fought back against the attackers alongside Americans. Libyans helped some of our diplomats find safety, and they carried Ambassador Stevens’s body to the hospital, where we tragically learned that he had died.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z0wllKURCq8

Robert, visit www.politifact.com, and you will see that both Mr. Romney and Mr. Ryan told more lies at their debates so far, than Mr. Obama and Mr. Biden.

The Democratic candidates, based on the debates, are definitely more honest!

Republican voters appear to like LYING candidates, huh!

As an undecided voter with two Master's Degrees, I guess I'm not halfway intelligent according to your comment. I'm going to make an uninformed decision based on emotion. Or unlike you I'm actually researching all 12 candidates that will be on the Florida ballot and making an informed decision that isn't based on the bias media outlets. I didn't realize that all my research should have been done before today, foolish me thinking I have until November 6th.

I don't think it did either, I thought both had their good and bad moments. I thought for the most parts it was pretty even. Romney pandering to this strengths that would get his base fired up and Obama doing the same. I do like the fact Romeny doesn't have a black book of women, but binders of women.

Well-said, Doe! Mitt's dad built cars, Mitt still thinks Ramblers are great and still tries to sell them. And the Gold Standard. And Goldwater!
The French bought Mitt's dad's company; see where it got them.
Mitt sold LOTS of companies. See how they turned out.
If you're in the top 2%, God bless you. Vote for Romney.
If you're down here with me in the bottom 98%, f-ing admit it. Only one candidate cares about you.
Re-elect Obama and vote for every other Democrat on the ballot -- except, maybe, for the Pinellas Supervisor of Elections and Sheriff.

John Doe get a life, there is a huge difference between acts of terror & terrorist attack....when it is acts of terror which is spontaneous in this case for 2 weeks that stupid movie was blamed but in cases of terrorist attack which is premeditated & planned just like what happened with 911 2001 so even though the liberal media continuously blamed the movie most of us didn't believe a word of that, which now they changed their tune finally admitting that it is a premeditated & planned terrorist attack, what a shame nobody had the sense to prevent this tragedy by refusing heavy security!
As for some of you liberals blaming us for politicizing to win the election something else comes to mind; is that why you want to hush hush this tragedy so that you get 4 more years of government takeover & lies, think about it if you are capable of thinking for yourselves only reason we want the truth to come out is for the sake of bringing justice so the 4 innocent lives due to being murdered by bunch of low life terrorists who need to be caught & justice served so that those 4 innocent lives can rest in peace!

By the way the used car salesman job was filled a week ago, Biden is a perfect fit for that position :)

Well-said, Joe.

Michael, as you can see from reading posts here, we even lack education on our government works.

Steve you are such a fool, what makes you an expert on women's issues, I am a proud pro life woman even more so after watching this video www.180movie.com as for Sandra Fluke wanting government to give her contraception, how embarrassing, are some women this desperate to go before bunch of men & say those words, no respectful woman would ever embarrass herself as she did & this folks is called liberalism making hard working citizens pay for her contraceptives with the high taxes we are demanded to pay!

Unless you make $250,000 a year and can buy whatever healthcare or whatever else you want, a vote for Mitt Romney is detrimental to your family and to your country.
Odds are, you'll never make that much money.
This year, vote in YOUR best interest. Romney genuinely cares ONLY for the rich, among whom he's a major player.
He doesn't care about healthcare: he can pay to go to any doc or hospital he wants. You can't.
He doesn't care about college costs: his kids went anywhere they chose. Yours can't.
He doesn't care about Medicaid: nobody he knows will ever need it. You know somebody: your Mom in a nursing home, maybe?
He doesn't care about Medicare: he can afford his treatments and prescriptions. You can't.
He doesn't care about American jobs. He has one, and so do his cronies, even if he isn't elected. How secure is your job? Honestly?
Barack Obama cares for the 98%, and, sorry, you're part of it.
Admit that you are and always will be among the vast majority of Americans and vote for the only candidate who's likely to make your life better.
Vote for Obama and for every other Democrat who can truly represent you.
You'll improve your life, and mine. Thanks.

One more time, Anti-Liberal, Ms. Fluke does not want the "government to give her contraception". She wants to have her personal insurance ----which she pays for---- cover contraception without a copay. The Catholic Bishops in their infinite wisdom with all of their knowledge of women's bodies have decided that Catholic institutions (hospitals, charities, colleges, bookstores) open to people of all religions as employees serving all people in the community don't need to include contraception coverage in the insurance the employees pay for themselves or receive as part of their compensation for their work. This will be worked out because the Catholic Church cannot just make up their own rules for secular businesses they run. Or the Catholic Church will just stop running those businesses. Please don't embarrass yourself any more by repeating an out and out lie which can be so easily proven wrong. Most pro-life supporters know this information. Now you do also. Please use it.

Who is a Lyin Fool Now, You listened to same lies so much, you are believing it, oh you are such a control addict but go do that to somebody who is gullible enough to let you do that, me on the other hand I laugh at you cause truth & honesty is on my side so if you can read, here's the truth about the Catholic Point of View :)
Bishops' Pro-Life Chair Strongly Opposes Recommended Mandate for Birth Control, Sterilization in Private Health Plans by Cardinal Daniel DiNardo
I strongly oppose the Institute of Medicine’s recommendation today that the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) mandate coverage of three particular practices in almost all private health plans: surgical sterilization; all FDA-approved birth control (including the IUD, “morning-after” pills, and the abortion-inducing drug Ella); and “education and counseling” promoting these among all “women of reproductive capacity.” Pregnancy is not a disease, and fertility is not a pathological condition to be suppressed by any means technically possible. The IOM report claims it would have good reason to recommend mandatory coverage for surgical abortions as well, if such a mandate were not prevented by law.
Continued On Next Post :)

But most Americans surely see that abortion is not healthy or therapeutic for unborn children, and has physical and mental health risks for women which can be extremely serious. I can only conclude that there is an ideology at work in these recommendations that goes beyond any objective assessment of the health needs of women and children.

The single largest abortion provider in the United States, Planned Parenthood, is celebrating the IOM’s report. If the HHS does likewise and implements its recommendations, these controversial practices will be mandated for all insurance plans – public and private – without co-pay from anyone receiving them. The considerable cost of these practices will be paid by all who participate in health coverage, employers and employees alike, including those who conscientiously object to Planned Parenthood’s agenda.

Without sufficient legal protection for rights of conscience, such a mandate would force all men, women and children to carry health coverage that violates the deeply-held moral and religious convictions of many. This new threat to conscience makes it especially critical for Congress to pass the “Respect for Rights of Conscience Act” introduced by Reps. Jeff Fortenberry and Dan Boren (HR 1179). I am writing to all members of Congress to urge their co-sponsorship.

Continued On Next Post :)

The IOM missed an opportunity to promote better health care for women that is life-affirming and truly compassionate. I once again urge the Department of Health and Human Services to focus on the need of all Americans, including immigrants and the poor, for basic life-saving health coverage – not on mandating controversial elective practices in ways that undermine the good of women and children, the consciences of employers, employees and health plan providers, and the common good.

© USCCB. All rights reserved.

This item 9677 digitally provided courtesy of CatholicCulture.org

Document Information
Description:
Cardinal Daniel DiNardo of Galveston-Houston, chairman of the Committee on Pro-Life Activities of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, issued this statement in which he strongly opposed the recommendation of the Institute of Medicine that the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) mandate coverage of surgical sterilization and all FDA-approved birth control in private health insurance plans nationwide.
Publisher & Date:
USCCB, July 19, 2011

There are more articles on how wrong you are about the Catholic's Stand On Birth Control, here is another article this one is from a Doctor's point of view:
NFP effective, leads to happier marriages, local physician says
By Monica Hatcher

7/17/2012
HOUSTON — Dr. Linda Holleran has been helping couples with Natural Family Planning for more than three decades. The Cypress-based family physician, who just completed a masters in theology from the University of St. Thomas, has one of the few medical practices in Texas that embraces and promotes the method. Based on the science of human reproduction, Natural Family Planning is an umbrella term used to refer to various methods of naturally achieving or avoiding pregnancy by observing the signs and symptoms of a woman’s fertility. Holleran, who for many years has worked closely with Joe and Cindy Devet, coordinators for the Archdiocesan Natural Family Planning program, said there is an enormous need for more doctors and nurse practitioners who support Natural Family Planning. “They would have booming practice because the demand is there,” she said. To commemorate the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops’ Natural Family Planning Awareness Week, July 22 to 28, Halloran shared her unique perspective on the beauty and wisdom of Church teaching with regard to human sexuality.

TCH: What is involved in NFP consulting? Do you work with couples who are trying to get pregnant or avoid pregnancy?

Continued On Next Post :)

Holleran: I do a lot of the basic things. At some point, if they are trying to get pregnant and still having difficulties, they’ll have to go to see an infertility specialist. But they know if they come to me for their pap smears or consultations that I won’t criticize them or mock them for using NFP. I’m accepting of their beliefs because I believe them, too. Couples take classes offered through the diocese or in their parish, but if they are having difficulties charting fertility or something doesn't make sense to them, that is when they come or are referred to me.
TCH: What is the benefit you’ve seen among couples who practice NFP?

Holleran: They have happy families. Women are proud of being moms in a really deep sense. It’s hard to explain the difference. I mean, moms are happy to be moms. With NFP moms, each child is chosen and cherished. It’s just a beautiful thing to see. There is a lot of closeness between the husbands and wives. It’s that kind of joy that comes from knowing you are walking in God’s will. It’s not as if it’s always easy. Some have special needs kids or their own challenges that they have to face but it doesn’t change what is inside. I see so many people and you can almost tell a person who practices NFP when they walk in the door. They are smiling and open and settled. I think it’s because sexuality gets down to the core and when you have that right in God’s eyes, it is a very special thing.

Continued On Next Post :)

TCH: In your practice, do you ever suggest to couples who may not practice NFP to try it?
Holleran: All the time! Absolutely! It’s almost a joke in our office because I refer a lot of people. I’m sure many of them never follow through, but I feel like they ought to know that they have a choice. When you look at the dangers of artificial contraception, it’s fascinating to me that more women don’t get scared. When a young woman has never had a child and is on birth control pills, for example, the risk of complications down the line is significant. Birth control pills are not natural to the body. In every other part of medicine, there is this big movement towards the natural. People are always asking for natural alternatives and want to avoid taking medications, but when it comes to their sex life, they’re very willing to just take a pill. So, if I am working with a couple, I emphasize how natural it is. I emphasize that the knowledge, once they have it, can be used forever — for regular periods, irregular periods, after childbirth, at menopause. They know their body. I also point out that intimacy between husband and wife increases. The chances of making a successful marriage are definitely increased. And they can use NFP to get pregnant or not get pregnant. So, it’s a skill that works both ways.

Continued On Next Post :)

TCH: What do they say after trying it?

Holleran: They are always happy. And for the ones that are not Catholic, I always wonder if that is going to pull them into the church. It’s when they find truth somewhere that they didn’t expect it that you wonder what else that could be changing besides their sex life.

TCH: What do you think is so difficult about this teaching of the Church for most Catholics to accept?

Holleran: That it works. I don’t think that most couples think that the Church teaching actually does work as the Church says it does. I don’t think they understand how it affects a couple’s relationship. They don’t realize that NFP is effective because they have never been taught. I don’t think that most people have faith that the Church knows what she is talking about. I’m not sure where Catholics get any correct teaching on contraception. I went to Catholic schools all my life, from first grade through college, and I never had anyone explains these truths to me. I never even read Humanae Vitae until I was in my mid 30s or early 40s and had my eyes opened to the beauty of this teaching.

Anti-Liberal. Your long,long cut and paste post just proved my point. And since I am not Catholic, you know what? I don't have to listen to an old, white, celibate Bishop yammer on about "family planning" and birth control and how Catholic families just don't understand how well the Catholic approach actually works! You apparently are willing to have him and the other oh-so-knowledgeable celibate Bishops control your reproductive and sexual life. And, Anti-Liberal, that is the point. I am not Catholic. I do not need any more of their rules put into law. We have a majority Catholic Supreme Court. We have two vice presidential candidates who are Catholic running for office. I don't fault anyone for their beliefs but I draw the line at them imposing their religion on me through laws.

Lynda you need to wake up & realize you are wrong Catholics are against on using dangerous birth control which has also been proven by the medical associations through out the world that these pills cause great damage to our bodies, my belief is on the medical side, use common sense Lynda why do you want to support a bill by democrats to approve this dangerous form of birth control, do you think they are going to care when you are fighting for your life due to adverse reaction from these horrible pills, trust me I speak from experience of losing my best friend due to advance stage of blood clotting, she was having stomach pains & doctor told her she was having pms which was not the case her condition got worst & she ultimately died, many doctors tell you this is a rare case but in reality & sadly it is not, so please understand it might seem I am siding with the church, my point is purely based on medical research & evidence, like you I am not Catholic, I don't believe in organized religion it is not for me but I do have a strong faith in God, I am pro life by choice cause I love babies, they are the greatest joy, I love visiting the maternity ward to welcome newborn babies & give a small gift or sometimes I give gift cards to spread random act of kindness, I don't belong to any organization, I do this all on my own so I hope you understand & give me some credit for this is who I am...
As for who won this debate we all have our beliefs & nobody has right to change us :)

Politifact is a known liberal media of course they are going to side with Obama, here's real proof Romney is right who got cut off by Crowley before he could finish what he was saying about the Libya situation, Obama did the ultimate apology by releasing dangerous terrorists who tortured & killed our soldiers...
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/oct/1/obamas-soft-policies-for-gitmo-terrorists/?page=all

That's right it is no brainer Obama Lied, he has blood on his hands as in his own words the only truth he told "The Buck Stops With Me"
Lets Analyze All The Damage From His Presidency!

Romney has a five point plan. The plan is to give more tax cuts for the rich and pay for it by eliminating the tax deductions for the middle class. The plan is to benefit his wealthy donors in the private health care industry by giving us Medicare vouchers and forcing us to negotiate with private health insurance companies when we're old and sickly. The plan is to increase military spending by 2 trillion dollars so that Romney's wealthy military contractor friends profit greatly building expensive weapons that the military is not even asking for. The plan is to repeal universal health care so that only the rich will be able to afford health care. The rest of us will just have to use the emergency room. The final plan is to close down Planned Parenthood and deny women their family planning, birth control, and abortions rights. We will return to a pre-1973 Roe v. Wade world where women will start dying again from having illegal and dangerous abortions.

Oh, holy sh*t.
So, you believe God's on Romney's side and pray for those he supports.
The top 2% of American earners, who get their money not from "toil," but from their already-enormous, mostly-inherited wealth.
That's Mitt's reference group. And the group that can spend the most on ridiculous lies on tv.
If you earn less than $250,000 a year and vote for Mitt, you're just plain stupid.
STUPID!

SFM. "(Gov.) Romney is not a professional politician'.? Just what else would you call a man who has been running (unsuccessfully!!) for President for the last 7 plus years? Is he just a "professional losing politician" ? Please remember he "retroactively" retired from Bain in 1999 or 2001 or some other convenient date for tax purposes. What kind of "business " do you think he is in? His money is managed by a blind trust or so he says. All he has done for the last 7 + years is to go around the country making speeches to rich people trying to get money to get elected. That certainly counts as being a "professional" politician these days.

Joe C., you've articulately outlined the many arguments against Mitt Romney. The only reason that Romney suddenly "cares" about the middle class is that his 47% comment made most of us angry. He has no scruples; he will say or do anything to become president.

Anti-Westboro Baptist the Westies were there when my son's Corporal Ken Kalish came home from Afghanistan. You can see his pics on my website. The Patriot Guard was on hand and blocked them out. The Patriot Guard also escorted the busses when the rest of his platoon came home to Camp Pendelton...Not to get of topic but the sooner we are out the sooner we can stop worrying about our children..Can't wait until 2014 to bring em home.

Vote to Elect Robert "Bobby" Saltzman Candidate
for City of Safety Harbor Commission Seat #1
www.thinkbobby.com
"THINK BOBBY"

Obviously you missed the REALLY rude guy the week before with the veneer smile and signs of early dementia - aka BIDEN!

Sara and Shary,
You find the person rude by how you lean politically. Liberals find Romney Rude and Conservatives found Biden rude. They did the same things. Get over it. It's hypocritical to celebrate ones actions and demean the others.

Sara Casm, I realize that you have no desire to pay for a women's birth control, but I hope that you have no problem paying for all of the unwanted pregnancies that will result. You should also have no problem paying for the costs of Welfare, housing, food stamps, schooling, social services, medical costs, social services, etc. By the way, it must also be okay with you that Viagara for men will be completely paid for but birth control for women will be denied.

Knock off the BS mumbo-jumbo and start expecting people to exercise some personal responsibility. I'm personally tired of paying for other's irresponsibility, but I have no problem helping those TRULY in need. I'll help the helpless, not the clueless. Now go be a good little lemming and vote your boys in and enjoy the Kool-Aid.

Excellent point Sara, don't listen to these foolish liberals ;)
Ladies keep your legs crossed & medically speaking stay clear of pills which has so many dangerous side effects & if you want to do the wild monkey dance use latex which is also effective for preventing serious disease & it is free at the local free clinic nearest to you ;)

Here's proof how bad pills are:
Bayer's Deadly Birth-Control Pills: Alleged Toll Climbs to 190, Shareholders Revolt
About 190 women have died while taking Yaz and Yasmin, Bayer's (BAYRY) two leading contraceptive pill brands, according to the Swiss media, and the company faces a shareholder motion condemning its marketing of the brands at its April 29 annual meeting.
The vote is unlikely to pass, but it will draw attention to Bayer's increasing problems on its contraceptive franchise. Through February 2011, Bayer faces 6,850 lawsuits in the U.S. accusing the pills of creating potentially lethal blood clots and gall bladder damage, according to page 242 of its annual report. The number of suits is growing fast. Last October, there were "only" 4,200 suits. In September, the total was just 2,000. The number of fatalities alleged in those suits is unknown, but a little-noticed German-language report on Swiss Television last year claimed that a search of the FDA's adverse event database found "in round figures" 140 deaths associated with Yasmin, and 50 with Yaz, the newer brand. Those numbers will be used against Bayer at its shareholder meeting.
Bad publicity: Customers dropping dead

Here's more proof:
The following adverse effects have been experienced by women on the Pill:
Headaches, migraines, mental depression (even to the point of suicide
and/or suicidal tendencies), a decrease or loss of sexual drive, abdominal
cramps, bloating, weight gain or loss, and water retention; nausea and
vomiting(in about 10% of users); symptoms of PMS, vaginitis and vaginal
infections, changes in vision (temporary or permanent blindness, and an
intolerance to contact lenses); gall bladder disease and either temporary
or permanent infertility, when discontinuing the Pill, in users with
previous menstrual irregularities or who began the drug before full
maturity. Several of the symptoms, such as migraine headaches,
contraindicate the use of the Pill because of life endangering
complications.
Breast cancer has been repeatedly associated with using the Pill.
Breast cancer has been increasing at an alarming rate in recent years,
especially among young women. "Breast cancer will kill more than 44,000
American women this year alone," a 1991 report noted, predicting 175,000
more new cases, "especially among young women.
Ladies these are medical facts which cannot be disputed by any means, our government & one sided media is not telling us, I wonder why?? please use caution & common sense, do your research, take care of your body & most important of all live a long healthy life to collect your deserved SS & Medicare benefits that you worked hard for...

Here's the number one cause of damage due to the pill, the one that killed my best friend;
HEART AND BLOOD ABNORMALITIES
Blood Clots can form, restricting or blocking the flow of blood to
critical organs and other body systems, possibly causing permanent damage.
For example, a blood clot in the heart would cause a heart attack; in the
brain it would cause a stroke or brain hemorrhage; a clot which moved from
elsewhere in the body and lodged in the lung would cause a pulmonary
embolism; in the kidneys a clot would cause a renal artery thrombosis and
kidney damage; in the retinal arteries it would cause temporary or
permanent blindness. High Blood Pressure and alterations in the blood clotting mechanisms may
be seen in women on the Pill. This may contribute to a 3-11 times
increased risk of developing blood clots in Pill users compared to
non-users. The risk is especially great for women who smoke and/or are
over 35 years old.
Ladies I hope this will be a wake up call, I wish I could have convinced my best friend but sadly not...

trent latta - washington

this is spam

Hello again Adam. I am a blogger on the Patch and was simply sharing another post that people who commented on this post might also like to read and comment on. I do not consider that spam. Have a great day.

Trent

and again,
"Spam is flooding the Internet with many copies of the same message"
http://spam.abuse.net/overview/whatisspam.shtml